Quirky Movie Characters – Episode 29
September 18th, 2009
Apparently, “A supporting actor/actress must use restraint not to upstage the main actor/actress in the play/movie.” Judging by this, our line-up has failed mercilessly.
Tags: Brad Pitt, Burn After Reading, Colin Farrell, funniest supporting roles, In Bruges, James Franco, Pineapple Express, Slowpoke Rodriguez
Arriba arriba!!!! Andale andale!!!!!!!!!! ja ja
I never like the “Speedy Gonzalez” is a very narcisist mouse.
About this chapter memory to Charlize Theron in “Monster” , always I belive that an abrupt change of interpretation is equivalent to a prize assured Oscar, like a strategy of the actor catalogued only of pretty like being Brad Pitt, to put itself little in the skin of a very different personage or attractive or average ridiculed idiot assures an entrance to that it watches it to the criticism different. I do not see it bad, but sometimes he is very treacherous, the other day I saw Brad Pitt in completes film of Quentin Tarantino “Inglourios Bastards” and I sent that… a film to me you mold to x actor, neither the film, nor Pitt in his personage like, much demagoguery for my taste, there is no a cinematographic search and actor Christopher Waltz robs the film.
Anyway, true a good actor demonstrates itself in many facets and not in a single, of there always the doubt that if an actor interprets always the same paper, this acting or doing of itself.
Sincerely I do not understand anything about the final of Showloon, are going to continue emitting chapters? I lost something? Perhaps I am dead and nobody said it to me.
Maybe I see dead people
Acerca de este capitulo recuerdo a Charlize Theron en “Monster”, siempre crei que un cambio brusco de interpretacion equivale a un premio Oscar asegurado, como una estrategia del actor catalogado solo de lindo como ser Brad Pitt, ponerse en la piel de un personaje muy distinto o poco atractivo o medio tonto ridiculizado asegura una entrada a que la critica lo mire distinto. No lo veo mal, pero a veces es muy alevoso, el otro dia vi a Brad Pitt en la ultima pelicula de Quentin Tarantino “Inglourios Bastards” y me remitió a eso… una película amoldad a x actor, ni la película, ni Pitt en su papel me gustan, mucha demagogia para mi gusto, no hay una búsqueda cinematográfico y el actor Christopher Waltz se roba la película.
De cualquier manera, un verdadero buen actor se demuestra en muchas facetas y no en una sola, de ahí siempre la duda de que si un actor interpreta siempre el mismo papel, este actuando o haciendo de si mismo.
Sinceramente no entiendo nada, van a seguir emitiendo capítulos? Me perdi de algo? Acaso estoy muerta y nadie me lo dijo?
@Tomas> I need a favor, Can you speak a little more slowly?, not always I can follow you. Thanks.
Heh, “some funny things with a cigarette”.
Love that line. Just opens up a whole new world of poor dinner etiquette….which I’m all for!
You definitely need these guys that’ll make you cringe a little, just join in and try raise the bar.
Brad Pitt can do no wrong. I wasn’t wild about the flick, but his performance is marvellous. The whole scene over the phone ‘uh…Osborne…’ cracks me up sideways.
I’ve never seen ‘Burn after reading’ coz almost evrybody says its too boring same with the ‘in Bruges’ its more of a lot of talks… But Bard Pitt portray different roles in ‘Burn after Reading’ as we usually seen him like a hard action actor.. Well he tried to venture in any different roles,nothing more i could say…
@Juli: Hi juli where can i search you in facebook? well let me know.. thank you…
@athenayesha: Hi! search me with the name “Juli Revolver”
Happy spring!!!! (FELIZ PRIMAVERA!!)